Is Chinese-style surveillance coming to the west?
Is
Chinese-style surveillance coming to the west?
By: Chip
Rolley
Taken from:
The Guardian
In 2005 I
was chased, by car, from Shanghai to Hangzhou by Chinese secret police. My
crime? Setting up meetings with Chinese writers.
I was there
working on a report for PEN International on the organizations that cater to
literary writers. What issues did writers care about? What activities did they
engage in?
The car
tailing us bobbed in and out of traffic to keep up, and later slowed when it
looked like it would overtake us. It was a frightening experience although my
companion from PEN and I were not arrested, and we suffered no consequences
from the surveillance and pursuit.
On the
other hand, the Chinese writers we were to meet with the night before in a
Shanghai restaurant, had been detained and questioned. One was taken to tea.
The other dinner at KFC. Anything to prevent them meeting with us.
We could
only hope that our efforts to learn more about these writers and support them
in their work would not bring them any real harm. And the experience left me
with an enduring admiration for their courage to even agree to meet with us in
the first place.
But that
was 15 years ago.
If we were
to return to China to do a similar report today, who knows if we would even
know we were being watched?
In a very
short time, China’s surveillance capability has become immensely sophisticated
and now extends beyond keeping tabs on political dissidents to developing a
system for monitoring the behavior of the entire population.
You could,
in fact, argue that the technologies that once promised to be a liberating
force are now just as easily deployed to stifle dissent, entrench
authoritarianism and shame and prosecute those the Orwellian government of
President Xi Jinping deems out of line.
Since the
massacre that ended the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests in 1989,
digital technology has given the Chinese government new, more stealthy modes of
silencing, oppressing and disappearing dissidents, and stifling historical
discourse.
This
includes censoring online even mentions of 4 June, and an ever-changing
catalogue of words and phrases that, depending on circumstances, are deemed
threatening, including “feminism”, “1984”, “I disagree” and certainly anything
that might draw attention to Uighur or Tibetan rights, or the independence of
Taiwan.
Twitter –
and many social media platforms people use freely elsewhere – is banned in
China, and many people who have found ways to work around its censorship have
been detained as recently as this year.
According
to Amnesty International, China “has the largest number of imprisoned
journalists and cyber-dissidents in the world” which is, of course, related to
it having “the world’s most sophisticated system for controlling and
surveilling the web”, as CNN has reported.
While we
once hoped the internet would deliver us freedom of expression, the ability to
communicate freely across borders and even be a channel for dissenting views,
we now see the very opposite is occurring.
Worse, the
Chinese model is now being exported. Wired magazine has reported that China is
“exporting its techno-dystopian model to other counties … Since January 2017,
Freedom House counted 38 countries where Chinese firms have built internet
infrastructure, and 18 countries using AI surveillance developed by the
Chinese.”
The scale
of China’s domestic surveillance apparatus is extraordinary. The country is in
the process of developing a “social credit” system which has been described as
Big Brother, Black Mirror and every dystopian future sci-fi writers have ever
dreamed up all rolled into one, and which is due to be operational next year.
The social
credit system will enable the government and others to access details of
people’s behavior, rate them and make them publicly available. The potential to
“name and shame” people for minor lapses such as late-paying of bills is
obvious but so is the way such ratings could also be employed to deny citizens
employment or to justify detaining them for political reasons.
Both in the
west and in China, the use of the internet to track individuals is facilitating
oppression and paving the way towards authoritarianism.
We in the
west are beginning to comprehend the sheer extent to which we are monitored and
manipulated via social media companies tracking our data and monetizing it by
selling it to political parties, retailers and even foreign governments.
The dangers
these trends pose are shown to be at their peak with tech’s willingness to
divulge our data or attempt to sway aspects of our personal lives and political
opinions. We saw this with the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data harvesting
scandal, as exposed by Carole Cadwalladr, and the allowance of targeted
disinformation campaigns.
What is
happening in Orwellian China today is a warning to us in the west that the
freedoms we have so blithely taken for granted are already being compromised by
the behavior of social media giants and other tech companies. The authoritarian
impulses behind such control have already seeped into the American political
system and without greater vigilance, and a willingness to fight back, we all
may be subject to surveillance on a Chinese scale.
Comments
Post a Comment