10 Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, Jaron Lanier
10
Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, Jaron Lanier
By: Erreh
Svaia
Vivlío
Fagitó
Jaron
Lanier has previously written two great books, the first You Are Not a Gadget
and Who Owns the Future? In both of them, the pioneer of the Internet and
virtual reality lashes out in a hard and incisive way against part of the
effects of on society, that his "revolution" has brought, a kind of
"cultural revolution" of almost "Pavlovian" nature, of
search for stimuli and rewards, a dependence almost as harmful as cigarettes
are in some people, an addiction to our modern world that seems to be going
further and further and whose antidote, as social networks continue to be
perfected, will be increasingly difficult to find.
10
Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now is the new book by
Lanier, if you are reading this, it is probably because I ignored it at some
point, it is precisely because I still think that in communication issues, I
could assure that at least Facebook is superior, talk about Twitter, Instagram,
Google + and others, just never seemed effective, talk about Twitter and its
limitation of characters that only makes people think of the 140 characters
more than the message itself, Instagram, a platform that seems pitiful,
superficial in excess and more a showcase for vanity, Google +, well, it's
history, in fact, we stay with Facebook, which in my case has served to have
much of the information that interests me at hand, being very honest, the
social issue is not so relevant, I rarely accept a new "friend", my
"network" is not very extensive, of course I try to share information
constantly, but also I also look for people who know how to share valuable
information, and discern between deceptive topics and those that are not.
The
scathing criticism of Lanier focuses on the transformation that the user has
suffered through the use of social networks, the rudeness which sometimes comes
in the exchange of opinions, the search sometimes for the "shock"
that leads to confrontation and above all, the grouping of users into
"tribes", something that in some way leads us to the most primitive
of our being, and in turn, is reflected in a reality that we currently live in
the midst of the rise of nationalism and the polarization of modern society,
that "pulverization" of society into tiny tribes that echoes Vargas Llosa's
book, "The Call of the Tribe" and that futuristic book by JG Ballard
"Hello America".
Today the
threat of this "Pavlovian" system that enslaves many in search of a
"like", that remodels the personality looking for that reward that we
see others receive and that orients our actions towards that goal, many times
objectives not initiated by a person , but by an algorithm that knows us
perfectly and knows what strings to play to get the desired sound from us, a
parade of desperate search for social acceptance and a basic ideology of
"like" = a I'm fine, and of indifference, a sign of something I am
doing wrong, creating a spiral of anxiety in people generally lacking a defined
personality in search of defining their nature.
Although
the social networks in the beginning were the great promise of freedom, of the
logic of the "free", of the "public", today they seem to
mean the opposite, the requirement of a very high payment to
"belong", the exclusivity of certain tribes, social aggression
towards individual thought, a sort of giant "hive" in which the
individual begins to lose the fight against collectivism and in which the
tyranny of "like" becomes an oppressive obsession for many, and whose
coldness could become a condemnation of harsh consequences in the most defenseless
psyche.
Two
additional thoughts, one, the danger of the evolution of this addictive
machinery of stimuli and rewards in the hands inadequate, today are large
corporations who extract portentous amounts of information about our behavior
patterns, our motivators and our fears, tomorrow it could be a government with
totalitarian aspirations that could be more dangerous than those old secret
police that sought to detect dissent and repress it brutally.
On the
other hand, they become the perfect tool for ambitious collective projects such
as the Chinese government, which is already seeking to apply the "Facebook
nation" model to society and to set the guidelines for behavior based on
stimuli and rewards, and also of punishments, Black Mirror was not so wrong.
Comments
Post a Comment